Liu WB; Rui HL; Liu BL · 2026 · Xenotransplantation
Paper
The recent milestone publication by Schmauch et al. in Nature (650 (2026): 205-217) describes a 61-day longitudinal multi-omics analysis of a gene-edited pig-to-human kidney xenotransplant in a brain-dead decedent. This study provides an unprecedented high-resolution map of the xenogeneic immune response. In this commentary, we move beyond summary to interpret these findings through a clinical transplant lens, contrasting xenograft rejection with established experience in human renal allografts. This comparison highlights practice-relevant differences in immune hierarchy, rejection chronology, and the dominant contribution of innate and humoral immunity. Recognizing these differences-moving from the "civil war" of allotransplantation to the "interspecies conflict" of xenotransplantation-will be essential for designing first-in-human trials, tailoring immunosuppressive regimens, and building rational monitoring strategies as the field advances toward living recipients.
Analysis
This commentary interprets a 61-day multi-omics analysis of a gene-edited pig-to-human kidney xenotransplant, highlighting key differences in immune response compared to human allografts.
Discovery
Denner J
He Y; Peng Y; Liu Y; Jia J; Li L; Hara H; Feng S; Pan Z
Mulbjerg H; Ringgaard S; Agger P
Rao JS; Rangarajan P; Shetty A; Steinhoff M; Tran A; Crane AT; Low WC; Steer CJ; Ramachandran S
Bartley P. Griffith; Corbin E. Goerlich; Avneesh K. Singh; Martine Rothblatt; Christine L. Lau; Aakash Shah; Marc I. Lorber; Alison Grazioli; Kapil Saharia; Susie N. Hong; Susan Joseph; David Ayares; Muhammad M. Mohiuddin
Daniel Eisenson; Yu Hisadome; Kazuhiko Yamada
Source record