Peter M. Higgins; Weibin Chen; Oliver Warr; Lucas M. Fifer; Wanying Kang; Charles S. Cockell; Barbara Sherwood Lollar · 2026
Paper
Ocean worlds are considered as targets for life detection missions because they meet several key requirements for habitability. However, identifying potential life on other worlds requires observing clear and unambiguous biosignature signals above the existing abiotic baseline. Consequently, this necessitates evaluating uncertainty and variability in the abiotic baseline, including processes that can overlap, attenuate, or obfuscate biosignatures before they are observed. This article develops a quantitative framework for holistically evaluating abiotic baselines on ocean worlds to guide life detection strategies. Using Enceladus as an example, we assess the potential of using: i) CH$_{4}$ isotopes and their relationship with CO$_{2}$, and ii) amino acid chirality as biosignatures, demonstrating that uncertainties in abiotic processes currently prevent hypothetical future $δ^{13}$C$_{\mathrm{CO2}}$ and $δ^{13}$C$_{\mathrm{CH4}}$ measurements from definitively inferring a biosphere on Enceladus. Additionally, our results quantitatively show that neglecting the abiotic baseline risks false negative life detection claims for both isotopic and chiral biosignatures. Interpreting these and other alternative biosignatures on Enceladus, Europa, Titan, and similar planetary bodies therefore requires complimentary geophysical observations such as constraining internal temperatures to within $\sim$10-100$^{\circ}$C, and improving characterisation of the target's rheology, lithology, initial abiotic organic inventory and ocean transport timescales.
Analysis
This paper proposes a quantitative framework to evaluate abiotic baselines on ocean worlds, crucial for distinguishing biosignatures from non-biological processes in the search for extraterrestrial life.
Discovery
Nancy Y. Kiang; Christopher Gisriel; Robert E. Blankenship; Mary N. Parenteau; Hazel A. Barton; Oded Béjà; Anthony J. Burnetti; Ligia F. Coelho; Saleheh Ebadirad; Nathan M. Ennist; Yuka Fujii; Colin Gates; R. J. Graham; Keiichi Inoue; Betül Kaçar; Yu Komatsu; Émilie A. Laflèche; Nicoletta La Rocca; Elisabetta Liistro; Jonathan Lindsey; Timothy Lyons; Carolina A. Martinez-Gutierrez; Taro Matsuo; Victoria Meadows; Gary F. Moore; Massimo Olivucci; Kevin E. Redding; Edward W. Schwieterman; Tejinder Singh; Kenji Takizawa; Anna Grace Ulses; Junko Yano; Felisa Wolfe-Simon; Michael L. Wong; Anastasia G. Yanchilina
Caroline Haslebacher; Emeline Bolmont; Marco Cilibrasi; Jonathan Grone; Nico Haslebacher; Ravit Helled; Mathilde Kervazo; Niels F. W. Ligterink; Christophe Lovis; Lucio Mayer; Lorenzo Obersnel; Rafael Ottersberg; Apurva V. Oza; C. H. Lucas Patty; Antoine Pommerol; Ganna Portyankina; Alyssa R. Rhoden; Leander Schlarmann; Yuhito Shibaike; Vishaal Singh; Audrey H. Vorburger; Peter Wurz
Conor A. Nixon; Samuel Birch; Audrey Chatain; Charles Cockell; Kendra K. Farnsworth; Peter M. Higgins; Stéphane Le Mouélic; Rosaly M. C. Lopes; Michael J. Malaska; Mohit Melwani Daswani; Kelly E. Miller; Catherine D. Neish; Olaf G. Podlaha; Jani Radebaugh; Lauren R. Schurmeier; Ashley Schoenfeld; Krista M. Soderlund; Anezina Solomonidou; Christophe Sotin; Nicholas A. Teanby; Tetsuya Tokano; Steven D. Vance
Niki Parenteau; Giada Arney; Eleanora Alei; Ruslan Belikov; Svetlana; Berdyugina; Dawn Cardace; Ligia F. Coelho; Kevin Fogarty; Kenneth Gordon; Jonathan Grone; Natalie Hinkel; Nancy Kiang; Ravi Kopparapu; Joshua Krissansen-Totton; Emilie LaFleche; Jacob Lustig-Yaeger; Eric Mamajek; Avi Mandell; Taro Matsuo; Connor Metz; Mark Moussa; Stephanie Olson; Lucas Patty; Bill Philpot; Sukrit Ranjan; Edward Schwieterman; Clara Sousa-Silva; Anna Grace Ulses; Sara Walker; Daniel Whitt
Saggio D; Phung CL; Bravo M; Corcoran TC; Snyder JC; Stieber SCE
Oza AV; Johnson RE; Schmidt CA; Calvin WM; Yung YL
Source record